Listen to a recording of this dictation (subscribers only)
Ascended Master Saint Germain through Kim Michaels, August 9, 2025. This dictation was given at the 2025 Conference for America: Rising above the superiority-inferiority duality.
I AM the Ascended Master Saint Germain.
What I wish to talk about here is that aspect of inferiority-superiority that relates to money. You can see throughout history but especially in the last 150 or so years, that you have a certain group of people who have an insatiable desire for superiority, and who attempt to buy it with money because they have figured out how to acquire money. There are two ways traditionally that you can acquire a lot of money, and it is by either taking advantage of other people’s labour, so you get them to work for you without compensating them in proportion to what they are doing. Or you can, as has especially become prominent in the last century, use money to make more money.
Money as flowing energy
Now, if you take Jesus’ parable about the talents, you will see that both of these ways of making money are out of alignment with the Christ mind. For what is the Christ minds perspective on money? Well, it is of course that when you multiply the talents – you are given more talents – which means what? Well, it basically means that when you use the money you have in a way that raises the all, you will receive a multiplication factor from the Christ mind, from the spiritual realm. Now, of course this cannot be taken literally. I am not saying that if you use money to benefit other people, there are suddenly going to be coins falling from the sky covering you from head to toe in gold coins.
But what is it you receive from the spiritual realm? Well, you receive energy. So what is money? In its original form money is energy. What is the characteristic of energy in comparison to matter? As you all know and as we have talked about before, Einstein proved with the equation E=mc², that matter and energy are interchangeable, or rather that matter is a form of energy. So, to simplify things, we can say that what people normally call energy – flows, this is energy that is moving as a wave, moving through space. Whereas what people normally call matter is energy that is in a stationary matrix, like an energy field that is vibrating but not moving through space.
If we take this definition, we would say that money is originally meant to be energy that constantly flows, that does not stand still. We can say that one way to multiply the talents is to keep the money flowing. This of course does not allow you to accumulate money, and therefore you cannot really buy the sense of superiority you want when you are trapped in the state of separation, trapped in the dualistic mind. You want money to become stationary, and how do you turn free flowing energy of money into the stationary energy of money?
“Financial instruments”
You create something called “financial instruments” and you will say perhaps: “Well some of these financial instruments are accumulating or at least in a sense multiplying money – isn’t that flowing?” No. Because it is all happening in this space that you today call a computer server, where there are just 0’s and 1’s that are accumulating and the money is not spent, money that is flowing is money that is invested or spent on consumption, so that it benefits those who are providing the product or the service that you are buying – this is what keeps the economy flowing, and keeps the economy growing. But “financial instruments” primarily increase the fortunes of those who have control over them, and if they are not spent on consumption then they do not benefit the economy, they are not buying products, they are not buying services.
Perhaps they are buying some palatial villas on Long Island or South Florida. But there is a limit to how many palaces one person needs. Perhaps they are buying some luxurious yacht, sailing around in the warmer climates with Russian oligarchs or American oligarchs, passing like ships in the night. But there is a limit to how many yachts you need. You can in fact sail on only one boat at a time, just as you can only live in one house at a time. Therefore, there is a limit to how this accumulation of money benefits the wider economy.
The social perception of accumulating money
However, when you look at the world you will see that there are clear cultural differences between how people look at this process of accumulating money. Now, you will see for example in the Scandinavian countries where you have a higher level of social awareness than you have in America, and there are certainly people that are rich in Denmark. For example, one of the richest families in Denmark are the ones who invented Lego plastic toys. But in Denmark there is a culture where the people who have a lot of money, and hoard it for themselves instead of spending it on benefitting society are looked down upon.
So, for example – the Lego family have invested heavily in the local community thereby keeping the money flowing, at least to some degree, and this is acceptable in the culture. Whereas those who just want to accumulate more and more, that is looked down upon as not being socially aware. You are not seeking to use your money to benefit the whole. There is also a clear awareness that even though these people have accumulated money through inventing a product, providing a product, it is reasonable that they pay a certain percentage of their income in taxes, and they do this willingly.
In the United States there is a different culture, and it goes back, actually in a certain sense even to the Founding Fathers, but certainly to the so-called Gilded Age in the 1800’s where the big monopoly capitalists, the industrialists, the financiers, where it was looked that those who accumulated money in their own possession, they were looked upon as the leaders of industry, the leaders of the financial world, in a sense the leaders of society. They were admired and looked up to, not necessarily by all people but certainly by many, this is because of the lower level of social awareness.
You look at the United States today, there are more billionaires than ever, there are more billionaires per capita than in just about any other country in the world, except a few. But still, these billionaires are paying a very small percentage of their income in taxes. Many of them are clearly only accumulating money, not even buying houses or yachts, they are just accumulating them in their accounts, not using them to keep the economy flowing because they are driven by this obsessive-compulsive need.
You would think as I said, you can only live in one house at a time, you can only sail in one boat at a time. You would think there comes a point where a person would say: “Now I have accumulated enough money, let me enjoy life.” A few people say this, but very few because they get obsessive compulsive. They are on a merry-go-round they can’t stop, because is it really enough to feel secure? Or, is it really enough that I can feel more superior than that other guy over there that I have been competing with for decades, and who thinks he’s better than me because he has a few hundred thousand millions more than I do. It’s never enough—it is never enough.
In Scandinavia once you have more money than you need for yourself, and people can generally accept that someone accumulates more money than they need, you need to do something for the whole – in America where is that awareness. Yes! Some people have it of course, but certainly not the majority, not a critical mass. So, what is it that keeps the majority of Americans from looking at the American economic system and saying with the wisdom of the Mother: “What’s really going on here. Why is it that the richest people are paying the lowest percentage of taxes. Why is it that those who could afford to pay more taxes and would barely even notice, are time and time again given tax breaks. Whereas those who can barely afford a roof over their head and food on the table, are paying a higher percentage of their income in taxes. Why is that? Is that fair? Is that democratic?”
The American dream vs. the Scandinavian dream
So, what keeps people from saying this? It is a special phenomenon that is often talked about openly and freely, it’s called the “American dream.” Is there a Scandinavian dream? Well! Yes. It is that few have too much and none have too little. But the American dream is that a few have more than they could possibly need. But they don’t need to share it because anybody could become rich and fulfil the American dream. That is what people in Scandinavia do not believe, and that’s why they believe that those who have accumulated more money should be taxed proportionally.
But Americans have been sold this dream that America is such a special society, the “land of opportunity,” that anybody who is willing to work hard could make it into the club of the billionaires. Is America somehow functioning on a different economic law than the rest of the world? Not really, the economics are the economics, but of course America is a big market and that gives certain advantages.
Of course, what is used to supposedly validate the American dream, is that once in a while a person starts with nothing, starts in their garage creating a piece of software, or stealing it from someone else, and then they become rich by selling computers to this huge market, and this supposedly validates the American dream. Certainly, the person who took over the DOS software and created Microsoft and then Windows, those few people did become very, very rich.
Free competition vs. monopoly
But how many computer operating systems are there? Only a couple. So, how can it be true that anybody who is willing to work hard and create a better operating system could become as rich as Bill Gates, when there came a point where Bill Gates used his money and his influence, to either buy out or destroy any competing software. You look back into the 1800’s where Rockefeller was attempting to gain a monopoly on lamp oil and other commodities. Because he had realized that the only way to actually accumulate a lot of money by providing a product, was to have a monopoly on that product so you could artificially raise prices.
In other words a natural economy, is that you say: “Here is a product called oil. It needs to be extracted, it needs to be refined, it needs to be bottled and distributed. What is involved with doing this, what does it cost to actually produce one bottle of oil.” And then you say on top of that production cost, the company is entitled to a certain profit. But the actual economics of the economy says, that if a company charges too high of a profit, it increases the incentive for someone else to say: “Hey, we can get oil out of the ground then put it in bottles and sell it, and since they are making all that money, why shouldn’t we get part of the market?”
So, as long as there is free competition, those who are extorting the public by charging too much, will increase the incentive for the competition. And when the competition comes up they will say: “We are willing to settle for a lower profit than Rockefeller,” and therefore they will capture part of the market.
Rockefeller realized that in order to destroy that natural aspect of the economy, he had to seek to gain a monopoly. He also realized that once you have accumulated a certain amount of money, you can use that money to suppress the competition, and that is the entire principle behind monopoly capitalism.
Now, Rockefeller even though he was rich, was really just a second rate capitalist, for he was seeking to make money by actually providing a physical product to sell. Morgan on the other hand was a first-rate capitalist because he said: “Why bother making products and services, let’s make money out of money. Let’s accumulate enough money that the money starts making money by itself.” And so that is the two: Cilar and Corruptus— the two beasts of Capitalism.
The monopoly on information
But what did these monopoly capitalists also realize? They realized of course that using your money to suppress the competition, seeking to create a monopoly that is really a form of extortion of the people—well that isn’t fair. And there was a growing movement in America, as there was in Europe, of Labor Unions, people having rights, people wanting to have safe working conditions, healthy working conditions, having reasonable pay. So, they realized: “We have to stop this, because this could get out of hand.” So, they did a couple of things, first of all they realized that it’s one thing to control money—that’s good. But in order to really have control over money, you have to have control over information. So, what do we do? “Hey, let’s buy some newspapers, we’ve got the money.” Now, we make it seem like “Oh yeah the journalists and the editors, they have complete freedom to write whatever they want, as long as they don’t question capitalism.” So, they invented this American dream: “Look we started with nothing and have made it rich, anybody else can do the same.” A complete lie, because anybody who tried to do the same, and started competing with those who had a monopoly, would be suppressed or destroyed, or even killed, run out of business, But they had the monopoly on information so they could spread the dream. Then they did something else, what is the greatest help to monopoly capitalism ever to come along: Karl Marx and the Communist Manifesto.
The big boogie man of socialism
We have said before that in a sense when Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto he defined both communism and capitalism, the typical dualistic polarity, two opposite economic systems. But you see the monopoly capitalists of America they were not saying: “Oh no, now we are going to lose because now we have this opposite.” They said: “Hallelujah this is what we have been waiting for, finally somebody came up with an idea that was useful.” How did they use it?
Well, I talked about Scandinavia, where you have higher taxes on the rich, public health care. When you take the average American today, certainly those who are in the business world and have this dream that they could one day make it rich, and tell them about this Scandinavian system what will they say: “Oh, this is pure socialism, public health care, that’s socialised medicine.” So, even today almost 100 years after the monopoly capitalists seized on the idea, many Americans believe that you either have completely unrestricted capitalism, or you have communism, socialism, there is nothing in-between. And that justifies in the eyes of too many Americans why you shouldn’t tax the rich. Ironically, the success of the capitalists has gone to their head. Now they think they have made it, and now they are not even caring about hiding it.
What did they do with all their money, some of them at least? They got a President elected who is a billionaire, and what did he do. He created a cabinet with ten billionaires in the government, they are not even trying to hide it anymore who is in charge. But they have so perpetrated the hope of the American dream and the big boogie man of communism and socialism, that a vast percentage of the American public believe that these billionaires can save them from the “Deep State”. For they have made Americans believe that the government is the enemy. And why do they want people to believe this? Well, what is it in Scandinavia that taxes the rich, well it’s partly because the people have social awareness, but it’s also the government. The government is the only factor in society that can limit the power of the monopoly capitalists. But the capitalists in America have made many Americans believe that if the government does this – it’s socialism, and they are going to come after everybody, not just the rich.
What is it that has happened in Scandinavia? Look at the average worker in Scandinavia, they have better working conditions, shorter working hours, higher salaries, higher benefits, free public health care, longer vacations, paid vacations, paid maternity leave and so on, paid childcare, paid for education. The government redistributes money from the rich to give benefits to the general population. The government therefore is looking after the interests of the general population, and it is the only factor who can do this.
But in America, so many Americans have such a mistrust of the government, that now they believe that the billionaires can look after them better than the government. That is what will turn the American dream into a nightmare, and it’s already far along those lines. As we have already said, one of the “wonderful” ideas that the capitalists have come up with is neo-liberalism – “the rising tide lifts all boats” but unfortunately the people are becoming poorer as the tide is rising. It is not lifting their boats, it is threatening to sink them. So, the wisdom of the Mother again can see that something is amiss here. Somebody is lying.
The established and the aspiring power elite
Now, it may seem as if I am trying to say that these old monopoly capitalists going back to the Gilded Age, they still have control of the economy. But there is always the interplay of the established and the aspiring power elite. And why is this so? Well, it is simply because of the nature of duality. As I said, you produce a product, you charge an unfair profit, it increases the incentive for someone else to get a part of the market, so they can make a profit. But it goes beyond that, it is simply that in the duality consciousness, those who lock in to the inferiority aspect, they are forever seeking to increase their status. Money, you can never have enough money. And as they increase their status, they increase the incentive for those who also have the desire for superiority to say: “Hey why should we be locked out of that club, we want in.”
But of course, the established power elite are not about to share, as you can see throughout history. Once an elite has become established, such as the feudal lords of the Middle Ages, are they going to share? Nay. What was it in the feudal system that gave you wealth and privilege? Ah, it was your inheritance, your family background, you inherited the estate from your father. That’s not a good system for an aspiring power elite. They want to be able to take it, not inherit it. For that is the luck of the draw, are you born in a rich family or not. You see in a sense that the monopoly capitalists, they were not born in a noble class family. They did acquire the money and therefore in a sense they set that matrix for the American dream. But as soon as they became rich enough, they tried to sabotage that dream. But because they did not inherit the money, the American system makes it easier for an aspiring power elite to come up.
The Northeast vs. the West Coast elite
And so what have you seen over the last decades? Instead of the old established money in the North East, you have seen an aspiring power elite of new money on the West Coast, the tech billionaires. And there was a certain man who had aspirations about becoming President, and he approached the old money in the North East where he grew up. And even though he grew up with a rich father, his father was not rich enough, and his family was not old enough to be part of the established elite. So, he felt rejected by them, and therefore basically put out a sign “For sale – any takers?” and so came the tech billionaires and said: “Here’s our chance to buy our seat at the table.” And they had an advantage, and that advantage was that the established power elite always becomes focused on what has worked for them and preserving it. An established elite becomes focused on preserving its position. So, they had a certain monopoly of information through the traditional media, newspapers, and television stations. But the new aspiring elite of the tech billionaires, they had the internet, they had social media, and they saw: “This gives us opportunities that the old elite do not have, so maybe we can now control information better than the old elite.”
Divide and conquer
And so, you have this battle between the established and the aspiring elite. Who will end up with the power? And it is just a matter of how does it play out when these two giant beasts are locking horns, growling at each other, fighting for dominion of society?
But what gets lost in this struggle between these beasts, is of course the people. For neither of the two sides want to liberate the people, or raise the people up. They want domination. In order to do this, they need to pacify the people. Therefore even though these two elites are seemingly fighting each other, they are in a sense also without realizing it, helping each other maintain the status quo where the people are so controlled by the elite that they cannot stand up to the elite, to any of the elites, to elitism as a phenomenon, because they cannot even see it.
Then of course, both of these elites are aware of the most efficient strategy of the fallen beings used since the beginning of time – the divide and conquer. And so when you control information, what can you do? Well, you can divide the people into different factions, Democrats and Republicans, working class, middle class. Or as Marx did it, the working class and the Bourgeoisie, those terrible people.
So, what do you see again, in the Scandinavian countries, a certain social awareness, a certain common view, a certain solidarity with each other that allows the people to speak with a relatively united mind against elitism. Which is why elitism does not have the foothold there—one reason, not the only one but certainly one.
In America people are so divided, that they cannot even see that the problem is not those other people who belong to the opposite party. The problem is the billionaires, the elite. That is the problem, that is the “Deep State”. The Democratic Party is to a large degree controlled by the old money in the North East. The Republican party has become more and more controlled by the tech billionaires, the new money of the West. I am speaking in broad terms of course. What is lost there is that neither of the two represent the people. More and more Americans are beginning to realize that, they are beginning to sense there is something wrong here. There is something fundamentally wrong with the system. The system is rigged against us.
But what does the elite do? They try to use social media, an alternative media to say: “Oh, it is the government that’s the problem. It’s become too big, its become too powerful, there is this hidden thing in the government that’s working against the people, so let’s reduce the size of the government. Let’s get somebody in here with a chainsaw and cut down the size of the federal government. Simple solution seemingly. But what are you cutting?
All of those Federal employees who are working in agencies that are limiting the capitalists, the power elite, seeking to look after the interests of the people, they are the first to go. But it does not change the fundamental dynamic, which is that you have a government bought by money, through campaign contributions, lobbying or direct corruption. Many people are beginning to sense this, and what does the elite do? Again, the problem is democracy, it is a weak form of government. No! We need a strong man who can cut through all of this and do what’s right for the people. Well! Really for the elite who pays him, but we can at least pretend he is doing it for the people. All of this serves one cause, to camouflage the real problem which is the elite.
A government of the people, by the people, and for the people?
Again, why did such a candidate get elected? Well, partly because not too many people bothered to show up and vote. But why didn’t they vote? Because they felt it didn’t make a difference. Because even if the other party had won, it wouldn’t have changed the fundamentals of the elite being in charge. So, what is it going to take in America, to create this elusive idea that Abraham Lincoln voiced so many years ago: “A government of the people, by the people, and for the people.”
Well! Who is going to run that government? It must be somebody who is of the people, in touch with the average person. It cannot be somebody who is belonging to the elite, and who has lost not only touch with the average person, but doesn’t care whatsoever about the average person.
It has got to be run by the people, so the people have to be willing to be engaged in the government. Instead of sitting back and saying: “Yeah, we can’t really be part of the government, all we can do is vote every four years, and then bitch the rest of the time about how bad the government is, and how everything is going to hell, and how nothing is working, and there is the Deep State, and there is the Democrats and there is socialism, and there is this, and there is that. But there is nothing we can do about it.”
And then of course “for the people.” Well! Who else but the people can have a vision of what is for the people. What do you have now in the government? You have a government where too many of those who have influence of the government, not necessarily the ones who are the bureaucrats, not even all of the elected representatives, although far too many of the elected representatives are millionaires – but where those who are influencing the government are not of the people, it’s not run by the people, it’s run by the elite and those the elite have appointed or bought. And it’s not run for the people, it’s run for the elite so they can preserve their positions or even expand them.
The neoliberal trick
For again, those who are trapped in superiority, seeking superiority can never get enough. And if they think money is the key to their sense of superiority, they can never get enough money, so they will keep accumulating – accumulating – accumulating. And how do you accumulate? What did I say, you either take advantage of people’s labor, or you create financial instruments that create more money, as figures on a computers server that doesn’t contribute to the real economy – but still gives you in your own mind that status, and in the minds of others, and you want to maintain that system. You want to continue to have the tide of the financial system rise regardless of how it affects the people.
You see the entire lie of neo-liberalism is that the rising tide does not lift all boats, it only lifts the big yachts, and it sinks the smaller boats. For that is the nature of this monopoly capitalism, unnatural economy. I will not even say unnatural capitalism, because all capitalism is an artificially created system. This is of course another deception that many Americans have bought into.
Capitalism is not a free-market economy
Again, when you define the two dualistic polarities, you can control what the people can see. So, what do many Americans believe? There is either capitalism or communism. Communism is where the state regulates the economy. Capitalism is where the state ideally stays out of the economy, and lets this mythical thing called the “market” regulate itself. The market will indeed regulate itself because the monopoly capitalists will regulate it by destroying the competition. But that’s not to the advantage of the people, neither is of course communism to the advantage of the people. As I have said before, both of these systems are elitist by nature. But once you spread this dualistic lie, most people can see only the two dualistic polarities you have defined. Well, if we restrict capitalism we are on a slide that leads directly to communism. Anything in-between, any alternative beyond the dualistic scale is hidden, it has become invisible.
What is the alternative? Well, it is to some degree a free-market economy. But how many Americans are aware that capitalism and a free-market economy are not the same thing. They are in fact opposites. What have I described here, there was a time in the 1800’s where the American economy was more free. It wasn’t completely free, but somewhat of a free market. Then came the monopoly capitalists and financiers, who took advantage of the freedom of the market, to set themselves up in this position where they had enough money to start restricting and destroying the competition—that is capitalism. As a capitalist you only want the free market so you can get a privileged position, and then you will use your privileged position to restrict the free market—that is capitalism.
The government: the hidden hand of the market
So, what is a free market? Is there some mechanism that magically regulates the market, as this famous book that talks about “the hidden hand of the market” but that’s just one little remark in a very long book that has been blown out of proportion.
What is the hidden hand that can regulate the free market? It is the government. A free democratically elected government that is of the people, by the people, and that regulates the economy so that it serves the people—that’s the not so hidden hand. You could say when you step further back, that there is a hidden hand that regulates the economy—it is the Christ consciousness. Because once you become a monopoly capitalist and you are not serving the All, there is no multiplication factor from above for what you are doing.
This means that you can only continue to accumulate money by taking it horizontally from other people. Therefore, you are suppressing the people more and more and more, like the feudal lords who became more and more oppressive of the people, until the people had finally had enough. A monopoly capitalist is essentially a person who is sitting on a tree branch with a saw, sawing off the branch he is sitting on, and sooner or later it will crash to the ground. The unfortunate fact is, that it crashes the entire economy which also affects the people. Unless the capitalists can somehow fool the government and the people into believing that: “If the market crashes, it is so bad and therefore you the government who we wanted to stay out of the economy, now that we have run the economy into the ground, you have to step in for the sake of the people. Look how many people will get hurt if the banking system collapses. You have to prop it up so we can survive and continue to exploit the people, use the people’s money to finance our exploitation of the people.” Then again, what can we say? That any government is the reflection of the consciousness of the people.
The inevitable correction?
Why didn’t the American people rise up after 2008 and demand a better financial system? Because they don’t want to educate themselves, they want to sit there and whine and complain, instead of becoming part of the government. And so, they got what they deserved, setting the situation for the next crash.
When is that going to come? Well, if the current president continues his current policies, it’s going to come in the next three and a half years. Because he is on a collision course with the economic fundamentals. Is that necessarily a bad thing? It might actually expose the elite and the elite’s influence on the government and on the economy. It will be a bumpy road. But as we have said before, if we have to take a few bumps to move quicker into the golden age, then I am willing to see that happen. But of course, that is easy for me to say, I don’t have any life savings in any bank on earth. I have mine in the cosmic bank up here.
The sense of inferiority
But I can say it, because why do we have this situation? Because the American people have not been willing to listen to me, and are not willing to listen to me, except for a few which is why I am even bothering to say this, and to project this into the collective consciousness. Because some will understand that have not understood so far. Some have of course understood all of this, this is not news to them, they could have for that matter put out all of the ideas in this dictation. But not enough people have seen this to form that critical mass, where the people have finally had enough and say: “What is the wisdom in having what we pretend to be a democratic political system and at the same time maintaining a financial system that is by its very nature directly anti-democratic.” How illogical is that?
But again, once you are trapped in duality, you are reasoning back and forth, and when you are trapped in this death consciousness of the inferiority, where you don’t really want to educate yourself, you cannot see this. This then brings up the second part of the equation, the inferiority. So many Americans have been manipulated into this state of inferiority, where they feel that they just cannot understand what’s going on in the economy, it is beyond them, it is too complicated. And it is complicated because those who have created the financial system have created so many layers, that it is hard for anyone to really have a full view of what is happening. Not even the people who created the system understands fully how it works. Otherwise you wouldn’t have had the financial crisis of 2008. I mean yes, these people created the financial crisis, but they are not that stupid that they would have allowed this to happen, if they had understood what was going to happen.
So, even the people who created the system don’t fully understand the system and its consequences. Yes, it is difficult to understand the system, but it is not difficult to understand the fundamentals, and what I have given you here is not advanced economics whatsoever. It should be economy 101 at universities, but it isn’t, because who owns the universities? Oh yeah! The elite.
But Americans have the potential to understand these fundamentals – but they have to be willing to take this little device they have in their pockets, and study how the economy works instead of looking at what the latest celebrity scandal is. Or looking at these websites that glorify one politician by putting the others down, that validate what they already believe.
Thinking you know enough
What is it that those who are in the inferiority camp, and those who are in the superiority camp have in common? They are both ignorant because they are in duality, so they cannot have the wisdom of the Mother that sees the inconsistencies, the contradictions in duality. But they both believe they have a certain view of how the system works, and they are not willing to educate themselves to see how it actually works. They think they know enough.
Are the American people stupid, are they ignorant, or have they been manipulated into ignorance by the elite? And have the elite use the superiority-inferiority dynamic in a very not really clever way, but at least a hidden way, where they have made many people believe: “Oh I’m too inferior to really understand how the system works. But I am smart enough to see that this person, he understands how the system works, and he can do for me what I can’t do for myself. He can save America. He is sent by God to save America. I am smart enough to see that, so even though I am inferior compared to him, by the fact that I support him, I’m actually superior to all those people out there who can’t see how great he is.”
Inferiority-superiority all mixed together, and the result is people are trapped. There are those if they saw this invocation you have been giving, who would take great offense to the verse that says: “The German people of the 1930’s did not want to consider that they could be wrong about Hitler, or that Hitler could be wrong. They will say: Don’t compare anyone to Hitler.”
But the invocation is not comparing anyone to Hitler. It is comparing some of the American people who are embodied today to some of the German people who were embodied in the 1930’s, some of them actually being the same people who have re-embodied. And it’s just pointing out that they believe they are too inferior to do something themselves. But they are smart enough to see the strong man who has all the solutions, all the answers, he could never be wrong. Even though he can barely say a sentence without contradicting himself, that’s really a sign of how smart he is. Because he’s confusing the Deep State, they don’t know where they have him, they can’t control him. Never mind that he can’t control himself. And so the people are completely blinded by this and trapped in this.
Then there is the other side who are reacting against him, they are believing that “we are also inferior, but we are at least superior because we can see how wrong he is. And we can see how stupid all those people are who can’t see how wrong he is.” But again, what are they both focused on— that one person.
The hidden elite, the not-so-hidden consequences
Do they see the elite? The hidden hand? Nay, none of them see that the problem is the elite. The two factions think it’s the other people that are the problem, and that allows the elite to rule. It’s a subtle way to control the people, much more subtle than what you saw in the feudal societies or in communism, where the people were suppressed through obvious physical means. They knew they were suppressed, many Americans do not know, do not realize how suppressed they are. But they are beginning to, but they are beginning to only because it costs more to fill up the tank in the big pickup truck, and it costs more to buy groceries, and don’t forget even beer costs more.
And so they are looking at the consequences of what the elite is doing, and they are complaining about the consequences but they are not seeing the elite. And until that changes, the dynamics in America, the gridlock in American politics cannot change. The government is not the enemy of the people, the elite is the enemy of the people.
Right now the government is not of the people, by the people and for the people, because the elite has bought influence and that is a problem. But it is not government itself, it is that the government is influenced by an elite instead of serving the people. Government is the only thing that can bring America out of the current state. Because even a Civil War Revolution type scenario, would not cause the elite to lose their influence. It would only pit the people against each other like it did in the Civil War.
You could step back and look at the Civil War and say it was not about slavery whatsoever. It was about who would be in control of the economy, the oldest established elite in the North East, or the aspiring elite in the Southern states, that used slavery to increase their profits so they rivalled the profit of the old elite who fought the people. Who fought? Did the people benefit? Nay because the old elite in the East ended up cementing their position and their power.
Sharing optimism with Saint Germain
Anyway, I could go on for some time, but would it make a difference? If what I have said so far is not enough, what would be enough? So, I am content to say that with your willingness to participate, we together have created these interdependent originations, and sent the impulse into the collective consciousness that I determined was constructive at this particular time.
It has already made a difference. Whether you will see this in the next four years so that we will avoid a crash and burn scenario, I cannot completely predict. I am however always the optimist, because I see the energetic configurations that are hidden to the physical eyes, and I see the undercurrents accelerated by the release of light at New Year’s. And how these currents are creating upheaval in the collective consciousness all around the globe. I am optimistic that Americans—a critical mass will awaken to the influence of the elite on their government. I am optimistic that a critical mass of the Russian people will awaken to see the disastrous consequences of the war against Ukraine. I am optimistic that not really a critical mass of the Chinese people, but certainly some of those in government will see that Xi Jinping is not the kind of leader that China needs in order to survive the challenges that it will be facing in part because of his policies.
And the same in many other nations around the world. There is upheaval in the Middle East where more and more people are beginning to question fundamentalist Islam. Is Shariah Law really a law given by God, or is it given by men?
And so, many of these scenarios around the world, where I see these currents beginning to stir up the waters that have been stale for a long time. It may seem as if there are threats here, and chaos there, and in a sense there is. But when the river has been frozen over all winter, the only way to get it to flow again is to break up the ice. And the ice is not going to like it, but the waters will. So, what you are beginning to see is actually, that in many places in the collective consciousness there has been this stillstand, this frozen condition and it is beginning to break up. And as we release more and more light, and as people respond by multiplying what they have received, and as you continue to have your influence, the interdependent originations are shifting. And I want you to at least know that I see this, and that if you are willing to tune into me, I will show you individually how it might affect you and your society. So, you can also share that cautious optimism that I have.
As I have said before, regardless of appearances, the golden age will be manifest. There is still a question of when and exactly what form it will take – but it will be manifest. You can be part of it by being here in embodiment, and instead of being disturbed by all the upheaval, you hold fast to the vision and you make the decision to accept: the Golden Age of Saint Germain is manifesting, and by you below and I above holding firm in that decision, we will accelerate the process.
So, for this I thank you, not only for your participation in this dictation, but in all that you and other ascended master students, and other spiritual people around the world have contributed to the upward movement of the age.
Saint Germain I AM.
Copyright © 2025 Kim Michaels